Parameter name: request
Translate Request has too much data
Parameter name: request
.rss_ul ul {padding-left: 0px; margin-left: 0px;}.rss_ul ul li {padding-bottom: 5px;} GameSetWatch - Opinion: Move Back To Kinect Our sites:GameSetWatchIndieGames GamerBytesFingerGamingWiM Gamasutra
« Castlevania Clone Releases: Koumajou Densetsu II | Main Monday, January 3, 2011 Opinion: Move Back To Kinect 
[In this editorial, originally printed in the December 2010 issue of Game Developer magazine, EIC Brandon Sheffield discusses the strengths and weaknesses of Microsoft and Sony's new motion controllers, and how their dependence on proximity could influence their demographic.]
Now that both Sony's Move and Microsoft's Kinect have hit the market, we can take full stock of the new kids on the motion control block. Where Move goes for a 'Wii plus camera plus greater precision' setup, Kinect hopes to make your body the controller.
It's no secret to anyone that these technologies are spurred on by the success of Nintendo's Wii. If the drive to create the technology wasn't necessarily Nintendo-inspired, the desire to release it with such pomp and circumstance certainly was.
Both companies have tried to get a drink of Nintendo's milkshake in slightly different ways. Each platform lends itself to a different experience, but both companies have unfortunately gone straight for the Nintendo-alikes.
King of the Me Toos
Many developers have played with either or both systems by now, but for those who haven't, I'll explain a bit.
The Move uses a camera to identify your movements (in a 2D sense), and also to put you 'in the game' at times, like the EyeToy before it. It uses wands to interact with objects and avatars on the screen, using both motion control and buttons simultaneously.
With the Kinect, there are no buttons, just body (especially hand) recognition through the 3D camera. Menus are navigated and confirmed through swipes, and holding your hand over an on-screen button for a certain amount of time. In-game actions are all performed with your body, and an avatar usually does its best to mimic your movements.
These setups each lend themselves more naturally to certain kinds of activities, and less well to others. Let's look at two genres: pets, and sports.
In the pets genre, Move has EyePet, and Kinect has Kinectimals. In both, you're supposed to be interacting directly with a little pet character. For the Move, it's a bit odd, because not only are you holding this wand in order to interact with the pet most of the time, your legs are physically in the picture, brought in-game by the camera.
This creates an illusion that you could reach down and grab the pet, but of course you're always physically behind it in the screen, no matter how close you get to the camera. The interface doesn't feel natural, and you don't feel as connected to your pet, even though it's visually 'in' your space.
With Kinectimals, there;s a clear distance between you and the screen; you're in your living room, and the animal lives inside the TV. But it actually works much better, because all your interactions with the animal are done via virtual hand avatars that mimic your actual hand movements. So it's much easier to feel like you're really interacting with this little beastie, and the minigames (for the most part) also take this interface into account. In this camp, the Kinect wins.
Then there's sports. Here, the Move makes great sense. For many sports you have a bat, or a racket, or a bow, so holding a physical object -- the wand -- makes you feel connected to the world. With Kinect, steering a car or holding a bat feels bizarre, because you don't have an actual 'prop.'
Whereas with Kinectimals, the feedback was very positive, here it's much more difficult to feel connected to your actions, because in reality these actions would center around a physical object. Pantomiming them doesn't cut it.
It's clear that each solution has its strengths, and areas in which it excels. But what I'm seeing right now is some strong me-too-ism. The first titles offered on both consoles are very much in the vein of Nintendo's biggest titles for the Wii, or the third party successes, regardless of whether it fits the system.
The dance, exercise, minigame, and pets genres are all well represented, and I guess that's a start. But to really succeed here, developers are going to have to figure out how to maximize the unique qualities of these systems.
The Proximity Problem
One similarity between Move and Kinect, which differentiate both from the Wii, is that they use cameras. It's interesting technology, but also represents a curious limiting factor.
In order to get Move or Kinect to recognize you correctly, you've got to be about seven-to-eight feet away from your television. You also need to have a clear, unobstructed view, meaning you've got to move the coffee table or ottoman.
I live in an urban environment, as many game developers do. I also am not the richest human being on the planet. With that combination, getting seven feet from my television is a bit of a challenge.
My living room is neither small nor huge, but I don't have a whole lot of space to move things around, and I really don't want to move my couch every time I play a game. I don't even want to have to switch system cables or replace batteries! I can't be the only one.
As the online space has taught us, any barrier to entry significantly limits your audience. So instead of potential players being those who own a Xbox 360 or PS3 and can afford a Kinect or Move (or buy the whole package if they have neither), layered into who actually wants the device, now you have the added element of 'can it function in my home?' That's a big deal. At each layer, you lose a portion of your audience.
Take the entire nation of Japan, for instance. Very few people live in homes that are large enough to accommodate a seven-foot buffer without reconfiguring their entire living space. Urban dwellers across the U.S. and Europe face similar issues.
In the U.S., the persons who will be most able to use the Move and Kinect live in the suburbs, and own or rent entire homes. This, by and large, means families. Both companies have specifically singled out families as the group they want to market their new devices toward, but due to the space requirements, they may accidentally be ensuring that those are the only people who can play with these technologies.
[This editorial was published in the latest issue of Game Developer magazine, for which paper subscriptions are currently available at the official magazine website -- the Game Developer Digital version of the issue is also now available, with the site offering six months' and a year's subscriptions.]
Posted by Simon Carless on January 3, 2011 12:00 PM | Permalink Post a commentName:
Email Address:
URL:
Remember personal info?
Comments:If you enjoy reading GameSetWatch.com, you might also want to check out these UBM TechWeb Game Network sites:
Gamasutra (the 'art and business of games'.)
Game Career Guide (for student game developers.)
Indie Games (for independent game players/developers.)
Finger Gaming (news, reviews, and analysis on iPhone and iPod Touch games.)
GamerBytes (for the latest console digital download news.)
Worlds In Motion (discussing the business of online worlds.)Monthly Archive January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 GameSetWatch [Twitter / RSS feed] is an alt.video game weblog from the people who run:
Recent Comments RSS? GameSetWatch's RSS feed
Who? Editors: Simon Carless & Eric CaoiliAbout GameSetWatch
Search Search GameSetWatch:
Game Set Watch Jobs A2Z: Senior Game Developer part of the Amazon group of companies - A2Z Development Center [01.03.11]
A2Z: Quality Assurance Manager part of the Amazon group of companies - A2Z Development Center [01.03.11]
Technical Program Manager - A2Z Development Center [01.03.11]
Cinematic Designer - BioWare Austin [01.03.11]
MMO Game Designer - Globex Studios [01.03.11]
View All Jobs Gamasutra News
Carpe Fulghur Talks Sales Reality As Promos Lead Recettear Over 100,000 Units
Release This: Lost in Shadow, Ghost Trick Premiere Stateside
Analyst: Core Gamer Likely Led GameStop To Strong Holiday
Square Enix Polls Players On FFXIV Updates, 'Drastic' Changes
Castle Crashers Rings In 2 Million Players
CityVille Has Largest Facebook Audience Ever
PopCap Will 'Look At' Going Public In 2011
Gamasutra's Holiday Week 2010: What You Might Have Missed
Pitfall!'s Crane: 'Never Any Doubt' Games Would Rebound After Crash
2011 Independent Games Festival Reveals Main Competition Finalists
Read All News Columns Column: The Interactive Palette Column: Game Time With Mr. Raroo Column: Homer In Silicon Column: The Magic Resolution Column: Battle Klaxon Column: Sound Current Column: Diamond In The Rough Column: The Game Anthropologist Column: @ Play Column: Alt Space Column: Game Mag Weaseling Irregular Columns Berkley's BUZZ, Bastards Of 32-Bit, Shmup Me Up, Letters From The Metaverse, Game Rag Slapdown, Cherish The Chips, Game Ads A-Go-Go, Compilation Catalog, The Gaijin Restoration, Free Play, Keyboard Bashing, The Gentleman Nerd, Green And Black Attack, Arcade Obscurities, Beyond 3DO, MMOG Nation, Parallax Memories, Game Collector's Melancholy, Cinema Pixeldiso, Column: Might Have Been, Column: HDR Knowledge, Column: Beyond Tetris, Column: Play Evolution, Column: The Aberrant Gamer, Column: Roboto-chan, Column: World Of Warcraft Exposed, Column: Jump Button, Column: The Amateur, Column: Save The Robot, Column: The Z Axis, Column: Why We Play, Column: Welcome To The GameSetWatch Comic, Column: GDRI Wisdom, Column: Vox Populi, Column: Quiz Me Qwik, Column: Bell Game And Candle, Column: Lingua Franca. Copyright © UBM TechWeb
No comments:
Post a Comment